3 Packaging Agreements, Follow-up, and Diplomatic Relations
Overview
The field of international diplomacy encompasses many topics, including negotiation, communication, and the use of various tools and strategies. The focus of Unit 3 will be on packaging and communication, both of which are important aspects of this field.
In the article “Beyond negotiation: The power of packaging in international diplomacy,” Jandhyala and Krishnamurthy explore the concept of packaging and its potential as a tool for overcoming negotiation deadlocks and building momentum towards successful outcomes. Meanwhile, in “Diplomatic communication in a digital age: The Nordic countries and the Trump administration,” Neumann and Wigen analyze the impact of digital technology on diplomatic communication in the context of the Nordic countries’ relationship with the Trump administration. The authors highlight the opportunities and challenges created by digital technology in this context, providing several case studies to illustrate the Nordic countries’ approach to digital diplomacy. By emphasizing the potential of packaging and the opportunities and challenges associated with digital communication, this unit provides valuable insights into important aspects of international diplomacy. You will gain a deeper understanding of Packaging Agreements, Follow-up, and Diplomatic Relations by the end of this unit.
Topics
This unit is divided into the following topics:
- Packaging in International Diplomacy
- Diplomatic Communication
- Transformation in Contemporary Diplomacy
Learning Outcomes
When you have completed this unit, you should be able to:
- Explain the concept of packaging agreements and its application in negotiations, as well as its benefits and drawbacks.
- Identify and distinguish the various methods of follow-up, such as evaluation, monitoring, and review, and understand how they can improve the effectiveness of agreements.
- Analyze the significance of diplomacy in advancing peace and security by examining its role in conflict prevention, conflict management, and peacebuilding.
- Evaluate the constraints and issues associated with diplomatic immunity, including its misuse, and develop potential solutions.
Activity Checklist
Here is a checklist of learning activities you will benefit from in completing this unit. You may find it helpful in planning your work.
Resources
Here are the resources you will need to complete this unit.
- Berridge, G. R. (2022). Diplomacy: Theory and Practice (6th Ed.). Palgrave MacMillan: New York.
- Hocking, B., & Melissen, J. (2020). The Transformation of Embassy Roles in Contemporary Diplomacy. Journal of Diplomatic Studies, 2(2), 129-147.
- Jandhyala, S., & Krishnamurthy, V. (2017). Beyond negotiation: The power of packaging in international diplomacy. International Studies Perspectives, 18(4), 394-412.
- Neumann, I. B., & Wigen, E. E. (2020). Diplomatic communication in a digital age: The Nordic countries and the Trump administration. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(3), 300-321.
3.0.1 Reading Highlights
Reading is an integral part of every unit of this course, along with the additional resources that are provided. As part of this unit, you will read chapter 5 to 8 of Berridge, G. R. (2022).
“Diplomacy: Theory and Practice” by Berridge discusses diplomatic engagement’s practical aspects in chapters 5 to 8. These chapters provide an overview of the key strategies, tools, and skills needed to engage in effective and meaningful dialogue with global stakeholders.
Chapter 5: This chapter of “Diplomacy: Theory and Practice” by Berridge examines the role of packaging agreements in the diplomatic process. The chapter highlights how packaging agreements can help to overcome deadlocks and build momentum in negotiations, by bundling together a series of issues and interests into a comprehensive agreement that meets the needs of all parties involved. The chapter discusses the importance of identifying and prioritizing the key interests and concerns of each stakeholder in the negotiation process, and using these insights to develop a mutually beneficial package of agreements that can build trust and promote cooperation. The chapter also examines the potential risks and drawbacks of packaging agreements, including the possibility of overlooking important issues or creating unintended consequences.
Chapter 6: This chapter focuses on the critical role of following up after a negotiation to ensure that agreements are implemented effectively and that relationships between stakeholders remain strong. The chapter emphasizes the importance of clear communication, ongoing monitoring, and effective dispute resolution mechanisms in ensuring that agreements are followed through and that the expectations of all parties are met. The chapter also highlights the potential challenges and barriers to effective follow-up, including changing circumstances, shifting priorities, and the need for ongoing diplomatic engagement.
Chapter 7: Explores the ways in which advances in telecommunications technology have transformed the diplomatic process. The chapter discusses how tools such as videoconferencing, email, and social media have enabled diplomats to communicate more quickly and easily than ever before, but also how they have created new challenges and risks in terms of security, confidentiality, and cultural differences. The chapter emphasizes the need for diplomats to adapt to new technologies while also maintaining traditional diplomatic skills and strategies, such as active listening, cultural awareness, and effective negotiation techniques.
Chapter 8: This chapter examines the role of embassies in the diplomatic process, including their functions, structure, and historical evolution. The chapter discusses how embassies serve as critical hubs of diplomatic activity, providing a physical presence for diplomats in foreign countries and enabling them to engage in a wide range of activities, from conducting negotiations to gathering intelligence and promoting cultural exchange. The chapter also highlights the importance of effective embassy management, including the need for clear lines of communication, strong leadership, and effective staff training and development.
Overall, these four chapters of “Diplomacy: Theory and Practice” provide valuable insights into the practical aspects of diplomatic engagement, from negotiating and packaging agreements to following up on them, using telecommunications tools, and managing embassies. By understanding the complexities and challenges of these various aspects of the diplomatic process, diplomats can enhance their ability to engage in effective and meaningful dialogue with stakeholders around the world, build strong relationships, and promote positive outcomes for all parties involved.
3.1 Packaging in International Diplomacy
Reading: Jandhyala, S., & Krishnamurthy, V. (2017). Beyond negotiation: The power of packaging in international diplomacy. International Studies Perspectives, 18(4), 394-412
Jandhyala and Krishnamurthy’s article “Beyond negotiation: The power of packaging in international diplomacy” explores the concept of packaging in the context of international diplomacy. The authors argue that packaging, which involves bundling together multiple issues or interests into a single comprehensive agreement, is a powerful tool that can overcome negotiation deadlocks and build momentum towards a successful outcome. The article begins by defining and describing the concept of packaging, and then provides several case studies to illustrate how packaging has been used successfully in various diplomatic contexts. The authors also highlight the potential risks and drawbacks of packaging, including the potential for unintended consequences or for important issues to be overlooked. Ultimately, the article argues that packaging is a valuable tool that can help to build trust, promote cooperation, and overcome complex diplomatic challenges.
One of the key strengths of Jandhyala and Krishnamurthy’s article is their emphasis on the potential benefits of packaging as a tool for building trust and promoting cooperation in the diplomatic process. The authors highlight how packaging can help to create a win-win situation for all parties involved, by identifying and prioritizing the key interests and concerns of each stakeholder and crafting a comprehensive agreement that meets the needs of all parties. The article provides several examples of successful packaging, such as the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, which bundled together multiple issues related to nuclear development, sanctions, and international inspection regimes into a comprehensive agreement that addressed the concerns of all stakeholders. The authors argue that such successful examples of packaging can help to build trust and confidence among stakeholders and promote more effective and meaningful diplomatic engagement in the future.
Another key strength of the article is its emphasis on the potential risks and drawbacks of packaging. The authors highlight how packaging can sometimes overlook important issues or create unintended consequences, such as creating a perception of unequal bargaining power or providing a loophole for one party to back out of the agreement. The article also acknowledges the potential challenges of crafting a successful package, including the need for careful consideration of timing, sequencing, and trade-offs. By highlighting these potential risks and challenges, the authors provide a balanced and nuanced perspective on the use of packaging in international diplomacy.
Overall, Jandhyala and Krishnamurthy’s article provides a valuable contribution to the study of international diplomacy by highlighting the power and potential of packaging as a tool for building trust, promoting cooperation, and overcoming diplomatic deadlocks. The article provides a clear definition of packaging, along with several case studies and examples to illustrate its effectiveness in practice. The authors also highlight the potential risks and drawbacks of packaging, providing a balanced perspective on the use of this tool in the diplomatic process. As such, the article is a valuable resource for scholars and practitioners alike who seek to enhance their understanding of the practical aspects of international diplomacy.
Note that the learning activities in this course are ungraded, unless specified. They are designed to help you succeed in your assessments in this course, so you are strongly encouraged to complete them.
:::
–>
3.2 Diplomatic Communication
Neumann, I. B., & Wigen, E. E. (2020). Diplomatic communication in a digital age: The Nordic countries and the Trump administration. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15(3), 300-321.
The article “Diplomatic communication in a digital age” provides a nuanced analysis of the challenges and opportunities of diplomatic communication in the digital age, and is a valuable resource for scholars and practitioners seeking to enhance their understanding of this topic.
Neumann and Wigen’s article “Diplomatic communication in a digital age: The Nordic countries and the Trump administration” explores the impact of digital technology on diplomatic communication in the context of the Nordic countries’ relationship with the Trump administration. The authors argue that digital technology has fundamentally transformed the nature of diplomatic communication, creating new opportunities for direct communication between leaders and reducing the importance of traditional diplomatic channels. The article begins by providing an overview of the Nordic countries’ approach to digital diplomacy, highlighting the innovative use of social media and other digital tools to engage with foreign audiences. The authors then provide several case studies to illustrate the challenges and opportunities of digital diplomacy in the context of the Trump administration, including the use of Twitter diplomacy and the impact of leaks and cyber attacks on diplomatic communication.
One of the key strengths of Neumann and Wigen’s article is their emphasis on the potential benefits and drawbacks of digital diplomacy. The authors highlight how digital technology can enable more direct and immediate communication between leaders, creating opportunities for faster and more effective engagement on critical issues. They also acknowledge the potential risks and challenges of digital diplomacy, including the potential for miscommunication, the spread of misinformation, and the difficulty of managing communication in a rapidly changing digital landscape. The article provides several examples of how the Nordic countries have navigated these challenges, such as the use of clear communication strategies and the importance of maintaining traditional diplomatic channels alongside digital tools.
Another key strength of the article is its focus on the specific context of the Nordic countries’ relationship with the Trump administration. The authors highlight the unique challenges faced by the Nordic countries in engaging with the Trump administration, including the administration’s unconventional approach to diplomacy and the potential for unpredictable communication via Twitter and other digital channels. The article provides several examples of how the Nordic countries responded to these challenges, such as the use of targeted messaging and engagement with other actors in the U.S. political system.
Overall, Neumann and Wigen’s article provides a valuable contribution to the study of diplomatic communication in the digital age, by highlighting the challenges and opportunities created by digital technology in the context of the Nordic countries’ relationship with the Trump administration. The article provides a clear overview of the Nordic countries’ approach to digital diplomacy and provides several case studies to illustrate the potential benefits and drawbacks of this approach. By focusing on the specific context of the Nordic countries’ engagement with the Trump administration, the authors provide a nuanced and insightful analysis of the challenges and opportunities of diplomatic communication in the digital age. As such, the article is a valuable resource for scholars and practitioners alike who seek to enhance their understanding of the impact of digital technology on diplomatic communication.
Note that the learning activities in this course are ungraded, unless specified. They are designed to help you succeed in your assessments in this course, so you are strongly encouraged to complete them.
:::
–>
3.2.1 Activity: Watch
3.3 Transformation in Contemporary Diplomacy
Reading: Hocking, B., & Melissen, J. (2020). The Transformation of Embassy Roles in Contemporary Diplomacy. Journal of Diplomatic Studies, 2(2), 129-147.
In their article “The Transformation of Embassy Roles in Contemporary Diplomacy,” Hocking and Melissen, discuss the challenges and opportunities that digital technology presents for embassies, including new means of communication, greater public engagement, and potential threats to privacy and security. Ultimately, Hocking and Melissen suggest that embassies will continue to play a vital role in contemporary diplomacy, but that their roles will continue to evolve and adapt to changing circumstances.
Hocking and Melissen’s (2020) article, “The Transformation of Embassy Roles in Contemporary Diplomacy,” provides a detailed examination of how the roles and functions of embassies have evolved over time, particularly in response to digital technologies and changes in the international system. The authors argue that embassies have shifted from being primarily centers of information gathering and representation to becoming important hubs for networking, coordination, and advocacy. Additionally, embassies are now playing an increasingly important role in facilitating cross-border collaboration and cooperation, both among states and with non-state actors.
One of the key points made in the article is the way in which digital technology has transformed the way embassies operate. Digital technologies have enabled embassies to engage with a much broader range of stakeholders, including citizens, civil society groups, and other non-state actors. Embassies are now using social media and other digital platforms to reach out to new audiences and to engage in dialogue and exchange with a range of different actors. This is particularly important for small states and other actors that may not have significant resources or large diplomatic networks. In this way, digital technologies have expanded the role and influence of embassies and have enabled them to play a more proactive and dynamic role in contemporary diplomacy.
Another important point raised in the article is the growing importance of coordination and collaboration among embassies, particularly in response to new challenges and opportunities in the global system. The authors argue that embassies are increasingly working together to address transnational issues such as climate change, terrorism, and global health, among others. This requires a high degree of coordination and collaboration among embassies, as well as with other actors such as international organizations, non-governmental organizations, and private sector actors. The authors suggest that this trend is likely to continue in the future, as embassies and other actors seek to find more effective and coordinated responses to global challenges.
Overall, Hocking and Melissen’s article provides an insightful analysis of the changing role of embassies in contemporary diplomacy. By highlighting the growing importance of coordination, networking, and advocacy, as well as the transformative role of digital technologies, the article suggests that embassies are playing an increasingly important and dynamic role in shaping international relations. As the global system continues to evolve and new challenges emerge, embassies are likely to remain a key site for diplomatic activity and will continue to adapt and transform in response to changing circumstances.
Summary
You have learned in this unit the concept of packaging in international diplomacy, which involves bundling multiple issues or interests into a single comprehensive agreement. Also, the potential benefits of packaging, such as building trust, promoting cooperation, and overcoming negotiation deadlocks, acknowledging the potential risks and drawbacks of packaging, such as the potential for unintended consequences or for important issues to be overlooked.
Also discussed in this unit is how digital technology impacts diplomatic communication. You learned about the challenges and opportunities of digital diplomacy in the context of the Nordic countries’ relationship with the Trump administration. Additionally, you have explored how digital technology has fundamentally changed diplomatic communication, allowing leaders to communicate directly and reducing the importance of traditional diplomatic channels. Your reading also acknowledges the risks and challenges associated with digital diplomacy, such as miscommunication and information spreading.
As a whole, Unit 3 contributes to a better understanding of international diplomacy by emphasizing the benefits and limitations of different diplomatic strategies.